Aurora International LLC Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 THIS IS AN OFFICIAL CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SENATE OF ALLIANCES The International Senate Of Alliances is a group of delegates from 9 major alliances that come together to vote and discuss on the future of their alliances. The International Senate of Alliances will have a delegate (representative) from 9 major alliances who the leader of each alliance will select, either by election or by being appointed. Then, for 1 month these delegates will participate in discussions, votes, and will be able to represent their alliance's interests in the ISA. The delegates can post arguments, disagreements, or concerns in the ISA forums which will be mediated by the Speaker of the House (elected every month) and responded to by the delegate from the alliance the argument/disagreement/concern is brought up against. Alliances can also forge partnerships through the ISA, which will mediate and monitor these developments. At the end of the month, each alliance will choose another delegate again, whether the incumbent or a newcomer, and will notify the President of the ISA. The President will then add each delegate to the ISA and this cycle will continue. In summation, this is a governing body for the alliances. We hope that all 9 alliances selected to be part of the ISA participate and send delegates. If the leader of the alliance has been inactive for an extended period of time, any member of the alliance can volunteer to be the delegate. WE REQUEST THE LEADERS OF THE FOLLOWING ALLIANCES TO EMAIL @Aurora International LLC WITH THE DELEGATES FROM EACH ALLIANCE Star Alliance @Sky Global Holdings Global Alliance @NH04 Blue Horizon @Air Australia Airports Authority of India @rohithbala Asian Aviation Authority @Aurora International LLC European Aviation Authority @Aurora International LLC Sea-Group Alliance @Yoyo20 North American Aviation Authority @Sky Global Holdings Oneworld @penguincascadia We hope that all of the alliances mentioned above (and their leaders) respond to @Aurora International LLC either by email or by posting a reply below with their delegate to the International Senate of Alliances. We suggest you discuss with your alliance about the airline who will become the delegate for at least the next month. - President of The Senate, The International Senate of Alliances Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurora International LLC Posted April 24 Author Share Posted April 24 Alliance leaders have until 4/30/24 to choose their delegate and notify @Aurora International LLC. May 1 will be the first session of the Senate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sky Global Holdings Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 @Aurora International LLC Our delegate will be Attending the confrense Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sky Global Holdings Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 @Aurora International LLC I have talked with the board and our delegate for the North American Aviation Authority will be attending and we a requesting the the South American Aviation Association be allowed to participate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rohithbala Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 (edited) Hi, AAI will not be joining this senate of alliances. Edited April 24 by rohithbala Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurora International LLC Posted April 24 Author Share Posted April 24 May I ask why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurora International LLC Posted April 24 Author Share Posted April 24 Alliances not part of the ISA will not be formally recognized as a democratic allliance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurora International LLC Posted April 24 Author Share Posted April 24 Unless audited, an alliance that refuses to join the ISA will be labeled a pariah and airlines joining that alliance will be banned from airlines in the ISA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sky Global Holdings Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 Well what if he has a valid reson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sky Global Holdings Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 Also in addition what is there are smaller alliances that don't qualiy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurora International LLC Posted April 24 Author Share Posted April 24 16 minutes ago, Sky Global Holdings said: Also in addition what is there are smaller alliances that don't qualiy Alliances with under 2 people or public alliances that can be audited do not need to be banned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurora International LLC Posted April 24 Author Share Posted April 24 18 minutes ago, Sky Global Holdings said: Well what if he has a valid reson If he has a valid reason then AAI will be audited by the ISA and if it is deemed legal and democratic, and adheres by ISA standards, he will be free to operate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurora International LLC Posted April 24 Author Share Posted April 24 FROM THE PUBLIC RELATION OFFICES OF AURORA INTERNATIONAL AFFILIATED CONGLOMERATE LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION To clear up any confusion, the purpose of the ISA is to have a Democratically elected body arbitrating disputes and standardizing rules across the entire sim. Elections will be held once a month, and in the event of a tie, the alliance leader will cast the deciding vote. We have recently been seeing an increase in threatening actions across the sim, and have resolved to create this alliance to promote stability and justice for all airlines, regardless of power. Please join the ISA and create a better sim. For everyone. -The Department of Public Relations Aurora International Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rohithbala Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 7 hours ago, Aurora International LLC said: Unless audited, an alliance that refuses to join the ISA will be labeled a pariah and airlines joining that alliance will be banned from airlines in the ISA AAI is an organization I just made for fun, designed with the intention of coordinating flights throughout India. It wasn't meant to be something serious. There's no increase in "threatening actions" throughout Airsim. In addition, if this is even supposed to be a democratically elected body like you say, there should be an election for who would be president of this "senate", instead of you declaring yourself as the leader of it and having full control over it. Officially, you have no right to declare me as an undemocratic alliance. You can do that all you want informally, but you're treating this like it's the United Nations. It isn't. It's just a game. Do whatever you want, but I have no interest in joining. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sky Global Holdings Posted April 24 Share Posted April 24 I see this as a fair reason and North And South American aviation will not be joining the ISA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurora International LLC Posted April 25 Author Share Posted April 25 2 hours ago, rohithbala said: AAI is an organization I just made for fun, designed with the intention of coordinating flights throughout India. It wasn't meant to be something serious. There's no increase in "threatening actions" throughout Airsim. In addition, if this is even supposed to be a democratically elected body like you say, there should be an election for who would be president of this "senate", instead of you declaring yourself as the leader of it and having full control over it. Officially, you have no right to declare me as an undemocratic alliance. You can do that all you want informally, but you're treating this like it's the United Nations. It isn't. It's just a game. Do whatever you want, but I have no interest in joining. We have specified that elections will be held each month. Because there are no people to elect for the first rotation, we will be the president, but not the speaker. After one month, elections will be held to decide the new president and speaker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurora International LLC Posted April 25 Author Share Posted April 25 2 hours ago, rohithbala said: There's no increase in "threatening actions" throughout Airsim. Unless you are somehow monitoring my inbox, I do not see how you can comment on this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurora International LLC Posted April 25 Author Share Posted April 25 2 hours ago, Sky Global Holdings said: I see this as a fair reason and North And South American aviation will not be joining the ISA I hope that @Sky Global Holdings does not abandon us, or that will not end well for them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurora International LLC Posted April 25 Author Share Posted April 25 13 hours ago, Sky Global Holdings said: @Aurora International LLC I have talked with the board and our delegate for the North American Aviation Authority will be attending and we a requesting the the South American Aviation Association be allowed to participate If @rohithbala decides to pull the AAI out, the South American Aviation Association will be allowed to send a delegate. And if @rohithbala does decide to send a delegate from AAI, the president will also be able to vote so that there is an odd number of votes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sky Global Holdings Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 10 hours ago, Aurora International LLC said: I hope that @Sky Global Holdings does not abandon us, or that will not end well for them. We are not leaving completely Star Alliance will be attending and I am awaiting an answer from the AAI for the other alliances Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sky Global Holdings Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 10 hours ago, Aurora International LLC said: Unless you are somehow monitoring my inbox, I do not see how you can comment on this Can you please give us examples of these threatening actions Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurora International LLC Posted April 25 Author Share Posted April 25 There have been threats made by smaller, less powerful airlines that I will not name that claim to be making bot accounts that will attack our routes in Arcade I to try to destroy the airlines. However, due to the sheer size of AirFrance, we do not see this as a threat. However, to more vulnerable airlines such as IndiGo, New Agar Airlines, Emirates Airlines, etc. this could be problematic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurora International LLC Posted April 25 Author Share Posted April 25 (edited) FROM THE CORPORATE OFFICES OF AURORA INTERNATIONAL AFFILIATED CONGLOMERATE LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION When we earlier referred to "threatening actions, " we were talking about examples like this one that happened to us. Back in the 2050s, Freedom Airways market researchers discovered a user who was glitching the system to make millions of dollars. We decided that it would be a good idea to try and talk to him, but the user did not respond to any of our messages. We decided the only thing left to do to get his attention was to intercept some of his flights. He ended up receiving our route information from one of our former colleagues, and proceeded to create five bot accounts with the same exact information, logo and all, of AirFrance. The bots targeted our routes and attempted to bankrupt the airline, however with the help of several other Star Alliance members, we bombarded the bot airlines and rendered them useless. The user in question has currently ceased operations. This would've been devestating had not we worked together and were such a large company. We are merely trying to prevent this from happening to more vulnerable airlines. As for the user in question, their name is MapleSyrpAir -The CEO Edited April 25 by Aurora International LLC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rohithbala Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 16 minutes ago, Aurora International LLC said: FROM THE CORPORATE OFFICES OF AURORA INTERNATIONAL AFFILIATED CONGLOMERATE LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION When we earlier referred to "threatening actions, " we were talking about examples like this one that happened to us. Back in the 2050s, Freedom Airways market researchers discovered a user who was glitching the system to make millions of dollars. We decided that it would be a good idea to try and talk to him, but the user did not respond to any of our messages. We decided the only thing left to do to get his attention was to intercept some of his flights. He ended up receiving our route information from one of our former colleagues, and proceeded to create five bot accounts with the same exact information, logo and all, of AirFrance. The bots targeted our routes and attempted to bankrupt the airline, however with the help of several other Star Alliance members, we bombarded the bot airlines and rendered them useless. The user in question has currently ceased operations. This would've been devestating had not we worked together and were such a large company. We are merely trying to prevent this from happening to more vulnerable airlines. As for the user in question, their name is MapleSyrpAir -The CEO Stuff like that should be solved through reports to sviridot, not by going rouge and handling it yourself. It seems like you did stop the user from glitching the system, but you could've just reported it in the issue tracker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurora International LLC Posted April 25 Author Share Posted April 25 1 minute ago, rohithbala said: Stuff like that should be solved through reports to sviridot, not by going rouge and handling it yourself. It seems like you did stop the user from glitching the system, but you could've just reported it in the issue tracker. I don't see how you are in a position to tell be what to do. I took action that I deemed was necessary. If you would like to discuss this separately, you may start a new topic, but in this forum please stay on topic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.