rohithbala

If you're looking to avoid competition completely, try domestic airports in the US. These are ones ranging anywhere from 1-10 gates. Either running routes in between small airports like these or from one small airport to an international grade one is a smart move to get started.

I think that would be fine for international airports regardless of size, and for larger end domestic airports, but regional level small ones I think would be harder to calculate. I'm not one of them tech wizards, so I don't really know, but can the terminal counts and sizes for each airport just be edited manually one by one by just changing the values of them, or is it more complicated than that? If it's simple like that I think just opening a forum where people can put in airport terminal sizes/counts to be approved by either a few confirmations by other members (upvotes) or screenshots of proof and then those that pass you can edit them in whenever you have spare time

Any chance some temporary fixes can be done for smaller, regional airports in major countries, especially the US, by going from two to a single terminal in said minor airports?

An add on to have live TV (sports, live news, etc.) would be nice for screens on the flight. Either just one option for live TV or separate ones for sports (porn kinda expensive), live news (pretty cheap prob) and others would be nice

I don't know, but I've been doing that too. Just try avoiding both of your airlines operating on the same route(s).

That's nice. Europe should be a bit calmer, especially all the smaller countries. Seems like you're new, so that's a good starting point. I right now have two airlines, one in India (which is busy eventually), and one in South Africa. I'm hoping I can take take the whole African market soon since there is pretty much 0 competition there.

It does. You should probably be able to get almost all of the demand on that route, if not all of it, with a reasonable pricing.

The following is multiple feature requests all revolving around aspects of airports (lounges, gates, etc.). Lounges: My first feature request are lounges. Lounges in airports would work similar to how terminals work currently. There would be a separate list underneath the list of terminals, for lounges. Lounges can be customized with selection of services included, what classes can be allowed in, capacity, and other options, to give a price, like the price given for airplanes based on engine selection, configuration, etc. Gates: There should be a custom amount of gates at every airport to make it more realistic in size/capacity. We can't make gates to have a loading capacity and a list of lights compatible to board on that gate, so the easiest way to make this feature would just to be consider all of the gates to be of the same type. Terminals should also be a feature to make it even more realistic. Subsidiaries: Not a feature that is necessarily needed, but subsidiaries would be a cool feature. Sponsoring: Like subsidiaries, not a feature that is necessarily needed, but sponsoring would also be a cool feature. Airlines would be able to sponsor numerous companies. I know sviridot is very busy with work and would probably be unable to spare the time for the research into most features these days, so my suggestion is that active people in the community, if he approves, would be able to compile a list of, for example, gate counts for major airports worldwide. If there is interest from sviridot after seeing a sample of the data that would be collected, he could approve a continuation and this job of collecting statistics could go on so that, in example, gate counts could be listed for most airports that exist worldwide. After that, all sviridot would have to do is add the feature, which will take some time, but not as much as having to research beforehand himself.

Sorry pal, but not really. Most schools disable settings full out. In addition, you can inspect on any other device you have, like an iPhone that you claim to have.

This could just be a image off of Google. In addition, the login shows an iPhone. I believe that the mobile image would be pretty hard to change.

I'm not that tech smart enough to know how to do it, and I don't plan on ever learning how to since it's generally unethical in most situations, but it is possible, and not that hard. Search up what the inspect feature can do, and you'll see.

A quick inspect, I believe, would allow you to change the locations listed.

Hi guys, first off, this issue should not require intervention from sviridot, so please don't disturb him, as he has better things to do. He has work in real life and yet takes the time to continue developing Airsim every day. And also, please try to keep it somewhat civilized, because if somebody gets muted or whatever for a day because they lose their temper here, that's just stupid on them.

Hi, do you have any proof I voted here? If you do, please attach it, because if you're just assuming and invalidating somebody else's vote, I'm pretty sure that wouldn't be the "democracy" you wanted.

I am a member of the Star Alliance...

If you don't want commentary on a post you make, then don't post it publicly (my opinion, once again)

My opinion is that is what the community is for. We don't really need a community within a community. You'd probably have 5 active people max in your idea of a international Senate of Alliances. Take a moment to think it through. At max there are 10 people who are active and actually talk (as in users who aren't just quietly enjoying the sim without talking once in places like forums or messages). Once again, all of that is my opinion.

Just saying, if it's none of mine or anyone's business, don't post it publicly in a public forum. You said he glitched the system, so I assumed it was a technical issue he exploited. If it wasn't, my opinion is that all you had to do was message sviridot.

"that will not end well for them"...? Threats like that won't help you. It's ironic how you're mentioning that there are threats to airsim and at the same time you are threatening others.

Stuff like that should be solved through reports to sviridot, not by going rouge and handling it yourself. It seems like you did stop the user from glitching the system, but you could've just reported it in the issue tracker.

AAI is an organization I just made for fun, designed with the intention of coordinating flights throughout India. It wasn't meant to be something serious. There's no increase in "threatening actions" throughout Airsim. In addition, if this is even supposed to be a democratically elected body like you say, there should be an election for who would be president of this "senate", instead of you declaring yourself as the leader of it and having full control over it. Officially, you have no right to declare me as an undemocratic alliance. You can do that all you want informally, but you're treating this like it's the United Nations. It isn't. It's just a game. Do whatever you want, but I have no interest in joining.

Hi, AAI will not be joining this senate of alliances.

I was wondering why I had an extra economy though in my setup because I'm usually careful about not adding an extra class in, then I noticed I have an extra economy for all my configurations. Every time I type in a name for the configuration, and press enter to save it, it automatically enters an extra class (depending on what is selected in the drop-down at the time)

Alright, thanks sviridovt.

I accidentally created a economy class in my all-coach configuration. Now, economy is always showing up in price list. I can't figure out how to delete it out. Can anyone help me with this?